On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Li Dongyang wrote:

> Here is batched discard support for btrfs, several changes were made:
> 
> btrfs_test_opt(root, DISCARD) is moved from btrfs_discard_extent
> to callers, as we still want to trim the fs even it's not mounted
> with -o discard.
> btrfs_discard_extent now reports errors and actual bytes trimmed to
> callers, for EOPNOTSUPP, we will try other stripes as an extent
> could span SSD and other drives, and we won't return error to
> callers unless we failed with all stripes.
> 
> And btrfs_discard_extent calls btrfs_map_block with READ, this means
> we won't get all stripes mapped for RAID1/DUP/RAID10, I think this
> should be fixed, Thanks.

Hello,

First of all thanks for you effort:). I can not really comment on the
btrfs specific code, however I have couple of comments bellow.

Btw, how did you test it ?

Thanks!
-Lukas

> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongy...@novell.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h            |    3 +-
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c          |    5 ++-
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c      |   81 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c |   79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h |    2 +
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c            |   24 +++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

..snip..

> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
> index e49ca5c..65c3b93 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
> @@ -68,4 +68,6 @@ u64 btrfs_alloc_from_cluster(struct btrfs_block_group_cache 
> *block_group,
>  int btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
>                              struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
>                              struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster);
> +int btrfs_trim_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
> +                        u64 *trimmed, u64 start, u64 end, u64 minlen);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index be2d4f6..ecd3982 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,28 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file *file, int 
> __user *arg)
>       return put_user(inode->i_generation, arg);
>  }
>  
> +static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
> +{
> +     struct btrfs_root *root = fdentry(file)->d_sb->s_fs_info;
> +     struct fstrim_range range;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> +             return -EPERM;

You might want to check whether any of the underlying device does
actually support trim and also adjust the minlen according to the
discard_granularity.

> +
> +     if (copy_from_user(&range, arg, sizeof(range)))
> +             return -EFAULT;
> +
> +     ret = btrfs_trim_fs(root, &range);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     if (copy_to_user(arg, &range, sizeof(range)))
> +             return -EFAULT;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static noinline int create_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root,
>                                 struct dentry *dentry,
>                                 char *name, int namelen,
> @@ -2385,6 +2407,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
>               return btrfs_ioctl_setflags(file, argp);
>       case FS_IOC_GETVERSION:
>               return btrfs_ioctl_getversion(file, argp);
> +     case FITRIM:
> +             return btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(file, argp);
>       case BTRFS_IOC_SNAP_CREATE:
>               return btrfs_ioctl_snap_create(file, argp, 0);
>       case BTRFS_IOC_SNAP_CREATE_V2:
> 

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to