On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:38:16PM +0800, liubo wrote:
> 
> setflags ioctl should return error when any checks fail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 02d224e..e397da4 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -213,9 +213,11 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_setflags(struct file *file, void 
> __user *arg)
>       btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
>  
>       mnt_drop_write(file->f_path.mnt);
> +
> +     ret = 0;

Technically speaking, this assignment is not necessary as any non-zero
value is caught above as a BUG_ON, but assigning it to zero definetely
helps readability.

>   out_unlock:
>       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> -     return 0;
> +     return ret;

Good cacth.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.cz>

>  }
>  
>  static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file *file, int __user *arg)
> -- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to