On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Hugo Mills <h...@carfax.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Seems that currently none of the sysfs are created any more, so just >> remove sysfs support entirely. >> >> Fixes compiling warnings in 3.0rc3 > > I would actually like to retain sysfs support -- the current > entries may not be used (or useful, or in the right place, or even > visible these days), but there's plenty of things that could and > should go in sysfs from btrfs. > > So, please do remove the unwanted/unused file entries, but could > you leave the sysfs file itself, and the (limited) bits that create > the btrfs subdir? Otherwise, I'm going to be putting it all back in > this weekend when I get the time to revisit Goffredo's old sysfs > patch... > > Thanks, > Hugo. > >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankho...@gmail.com> >> >> -- > > (I think this should be three - signs, not two: my signature- > cropping script removed the whole patch) >
I'm not sure if Goffredo is following this thread, but I think you'll need a missing patch to provide a fs/btrfs/sysfs.h file in order to use his sysfs patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
