On 06/21/2011 04:49 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
If a inode is a BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM one, it need not to look for csum items any more.Signed-off-by: Liu Bo<liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c index 6193e27..1eca1d4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c @@ -2672,7 +2672,8 @@ static noinline int copy_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_path *dst_path, struct extent_buffer *src, - int start_slot, int nr, int inode_only) + int start_slot, int nr, int inode_only, + int csum)
Don't add another parameter, we're already passing in the inode, just check for nodatasum in copy_items instead of making all the callers do it. Thanks,
Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
