On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > > - When I run ceph with btrfs snaps disabled, the situation is getting > > slightly better. I can run an OSD for about 3 days without problems, > > but then again the load increases. This time, I can see that the > > ceph-osd (blkdev_issue_flush) and btrfs-endio-wri are doing more work > > than usual. > > FYI in this scenario you're exposed to the same journal replay issues that > ext4 and XFS are. The btrfs workload that ceph is generating will also > not be all that special, though, so this problem shouldn't be unique to > ceph.
What journal replay issues would ext4 and XFS be exposed to? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
