On Oct 31, 2011, David Sterba <d...@jikos.cz> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:19:18AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Oct 29, 2011, Chris Mason <chris.ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > The last one isn't a bad idea, but please do make a real mount option
>> > for it ;)
>> 
>> Like this?

> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static match_table_t tokens = {
>         {Opt_subvolrootid, "subvolrootid=%d"},
>         {Opt_defrag, "autodefrag"},
>         {Opt_inode_cache, "inode_cache"},
> +       {Opt_nocluster, "nocluster"},
>         {Opt_err, NULL},

> How about 'no_alloc_cluster' ?

I considered that, too, but choosing the option name was the most
difficult part of the patch :-) I ended up going for the shorter name,
just to get the conversation started ;-) I don't feel strongly about it.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to