copy_for_split has no error conditions and should return void. We
return 0 from split_leaf instead of ret since ret would have been
set using the return value from copy_for_split which would have been 0.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <je...@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 4c9dc73..263abce 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -2695,12 +2695,12 @@ out:
*
* returns 0 if all went well and < 0 on failure.
*/
-static noinline int copy_for_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
- struct btrfs_root *root,
- struct btrfs_path *path,
- struct extent_buffer *l,
- struct extent_buffer *right,
- int slot, int mid, int nritems)
+static noinline void copy_for_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+ struct btrfs_root *root,
+ struct btrfs_path *path,
+ struct extent_buffer *l,
+ struct extent_buffer *right,
+ int slot, int mid, int nritems)
{
int data_copy_size;
int rt_data_off;
@@ -2752,8 +2752,6 @@ static noinline int copy_for_split(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
}
BUG_ON(path->slots[0] < 0);
-
- return 0;
}
/*
@@ -2965,8 +2963,7 @@ again:
return ret;
}
- ret = copy_for_split(trans, root, path, l, right, slot, mid, nritems);
- BUG_ON(ret);
+ copy_for_split(trans, root, path, l, right, slot, mid, nritems);
if (split == 2) {
BUG_ON(num_doubles != 0);
@@ -2974,7 +2971,7 @@ again:
goto again;
}
- return ret;
+ return 0;
push_for_double:
push_for_double_split(trans, root, path, data_size);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
