[patch 46/99] btrfs: btrfs_close_extra_devices should return void

[Jeff Mahoney]

 btrfs_close_extra_devices has no error conditions and should return
 void. Its callers already ignore the error code anyway.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <je...@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |    3 +--
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ error:
        return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 }
 
-int btrfs_close_extra_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
+void btrfs_close_extra_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
 {
        struct btrfs_device *device, *next;
 
@@ -470,7 +470,6 @@ again:
        }
 
        mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
-       return 0;
 }
 
 static void __free_device(struct work_struct *work)
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_d
 int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
                          struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret);
 int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
-int btrfs_close_extra_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
+void btrfs_close_extra_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
 int btrfs_add_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                     struct btrfs_root *root,
                     struct btrfs_device *device);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html