Am Samstag, 17. Dezember 2011 schrieb David McBride: > On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 13:00 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > BTW on my ThinkPad T520 I do not perceive performance issues for > > BTRFS as /. But then thats located on an Intel SSD 320 where seeks > > should not matter much. > > Okay, that would be consistent with the slow behaviour observed by > others on fsync()-heavy workloads. Presumably this produces much more > seeky IO patterns than current common filesystems; I wonder if this is > a limitation of the current implementation or something that is an > inherent properties of the data-structures being used?
All I can say is that the ThinkPad T520 doesn´t seem the best machine for testing the performance of software. I have seen nothing thats actually been slow on that machine yet. Its not a machine for triggering bottlenecks easily it seems to me. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
