On 02/09/2012 11:50 PM, Lutz Euler wrote:
> Hi Liu,
>
> thanks for looking into this!
>
> You wrote:
>
>> Would you please test the following patch on your box?
>>
>> thanks,
>> liubo
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> index 77ea23c..b6e2c92 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> @@ -7653,9 +7653,16 @@ int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_root *root, struct
>> fstrim_range *range)
>> u64 start;
>> u64 end;
>> u64 trimmed = 0;
>> + u64 total_bytes = btrfs_super_total_bytes(fs_info->super_copy);
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
>> + /*
>> + * try to trim all FS space, our block group may start from non-zero.
>> + */
>> + if (range->len == total_bytes)
>> + cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
>> + else
>> + cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
>>
>> while (cache) {
>> if (cache->key.objectid >= (range->start + range->len)) {
>> --
>> 1.6.5.2
>
> I'm sorry but that didn't help.
> I applied the patch on top of v3.3-rc2-172-g23783f8 and still fstrim
> says: "0 bytes were trimmed".
>
> I left the printk's I mentioned in place. They show that now "cache"
> is not 0 so the "while (cache)" loop is entered but nevertheless
> "btrfs_trim_block_group" is never called. So I put in more printk's
> and found that the objectid is so large that the loop is immediately
> terminated (output of printk's in "//" comments below):
>
> int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_root *root, struct fstrim_range *range)
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
> struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache = NULL;
> u64 group_trimmed;
> u64 start;
> u64 end;
> u64 trimmed = 0;
> u64 total_bytes = btrfs_super_total_bytes(fs_info->super_copy);
> int ret = 0;
>
> // range.start = 0, .len = 160815300608, .minlen = 512
>
> /*
> * try to trim all FS space, our block group may start from non-zero.
> */
> if (range->len == total_bytes)
> cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
> else
> cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
>
> // cache != 0
>
> while (cache) {
>
> // cache->key.objectid = 213702934528
>
> if (cache->key.objectid >= (range->start + range->len)) {
> btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> break;
> }
>
> // This line is not reached.
>
> Here's the output of "btrfs fi show /dev/sda3" again:
>
> failed to read /dev/sr0
> Label: none uuid: 88af7576-3027-4a3b-a5ae-34bfd167982f
> Total devices 2 FS bytes used 29.05GB
> devid 4 size 74.53GB used 40.06GB path /dev/sdb1
> devid 3 size 75.24GB used 40.06GB path /dev/sda3
>
Hi Lutz,
Great thanks for your details, now this should be a worked one.
liubo,
thanks,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 77ea23c..693241a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -7653,12 +7653,22 @@ int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_root *root, struct
fstrim_range *range)
u64 start;
u64 end;
u64 trimmed = 0;
+ u64 total_bytes = btrfs_super_total_bytes(fs_info->super_copy);
+ bool all = false;
int ret = 0;
- cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
+ /* try to trim all FS space */
+ if (range->len == total_bytes)
+ all = true;
+
+ if (all)
+ /* our block group may start from non-zero */
+ cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
+ else
+ cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, range->start);
while (cache) {
- if (cache->key.objectid >= (range->start + range->len)) {
+ if (!all && cache->key.objectid >= (range->start + range->len))
{
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
break;
}
--
1.6.5.2
> Kind regards,
>
> Lutz
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
