On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:56:32 +0600 Roman Mamedov <r...@romanrm.ru> wrote:

> > Have You tried it Yourself? I think the problem was the remount
> > before the space has been completely freed in background. It
> > left a valid and working fs, with still work to do.
> 
> Yes, after some snapshot deletions the umount takes a really long time.

Ok, then the question is, why did this not happen here?
 
> > In my opinion the kernel should either stall the umount till the
> > space is given free
> 
> In my experience it seemed to do just that.

Hm, I did the umount under kernel 3.1 and after the reboot
I used kernel 3.2. Is that the reason?

Regards
    Norbert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to