When testing btrfs on 3.4-rc2 with unmount directly after a test
workload, I see potential deadlock:
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.4.0-rc2-debug+ #2 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
fio/2365 is trying to acquire lock:
(&type->s_umount_key#19){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffff8113d1d8>]
writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle+0x38/0x60
but task is already holding lock:
(&ei->delalloc_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00a864b>]
btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata+0x7b/0x240 [btrfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&ei->delalloc_mutex){+.+...}:
[<ffffffff8108cf1a>] check_prevs_add+0xda/0x140
[<ffffffff8108d359>] validate_chain.isra.33+0x3d9/0x510
[<ffffffff8108deb8>] __lock_acquire+0x388/0x900
[<ffffffff8108e955>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[<ffffffff815a9b0b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6b/0x340
[<ffffffffa00a864b>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata+0x7b/0x240 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a890b>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x3b/0x60 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00b11cf>] btrfs_save_ino_cache+0x23f/0x310 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00b9370>] commit_fs_roots.isra.22+0xc0/0x190 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00ba56c>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4cc/0x8e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00c8f86>] btrfs_sync_file+0x116/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81140db1>] do_fsync+0x51/0x80
[<ffffffff811410cb>] sys_fsync+0xb/0x10
[<ffffffff815ad122>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-> #1 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+...}:
[<ffffffff8108cf1a>] check_prevs_add+0xda/0x140
[<ffffffff8108d359>] validate_chain.isra.33+0x3d9/0x510
[<ffffffff8108deb8>] __lock_acquire+0x388/0x900
[<ffffffff8108e53d>] lock_release_non_nested+0x10d/0x310
[<ffffffff8108e76a>] lock_release_nested+0x2a/0xa0
[<ffffffff8108e88d>] __lock_release+0xad/0xd0
[<ffffffff8108e8e6>] lock_release+0x36/0x50
[<ffffffff815a9e66>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x86/0x150
[<ffffffff815a9f39>] mutex_unlock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffffa00ba7b7>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x717/0x8e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00953ab>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x4b/0x80 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81140e9e>] __sync_filesystem+0x5e/0x90
[<ffffffff81140ee7>] sync_one_sb+0x17/0x20
[<ffffffff811189e9>] iterate_supers+0xe9/0xf0
[<ffffffff81140f92>] sys_sync+0x42/0x60
[<ffffffff815ad122>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-> #0 (&type->s_umount_key#19){+++++.}:
[<ffffffff8108ce29>] check_prev_add+0x719/0x730
[<ffffffff8108cf1a>] check_prevs_add+0xda/0x140
[<ffffffff8108d359>] validate_chain.isra.33+0x3d9/0x510
[<ffffffff8108deb8>] __lock_acquire+0x388/0x900
[<ffffffff8108e955>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[<ffffffff815aa2a7>] down_read+0x47/0x5c
[<ffffffff8113d1d8>] writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle+0x38/0x60
[<ffffffffa00a0b2a>] shrink_delalloc+0x13a/0x200 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a7672>] reserve_metadata_bytes.isra.70+0x1c2/0x430 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a86ff>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata+0x12f/0x240 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a890b>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x3b/0x60 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bceea>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x14a/0x410 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff810c641c>] generic_file_direct_write+0xcc/0x190
[<ffffffffa0112391>] __btrfs_direct_write+0x40/0x146 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00ca3af>] btrfs_file_aio_write+0x33f/0x350 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8115b1a9>] aio_rw_vect_retry+0xb9/0x160
[<ffffffff8115caee>] aio_run_iocb+0x5e/0x150
[<ffffffff8115d265>] io_submit_one+0x175/0x220
[<ffffffff8115d6d9>] do_io_submit+0x129/0x1c0
[<ffffffff8115d77b>] sys_io_submit+0xb/0x10
[<ffffffff815ad122>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&type->s_umount_key#19 --> &fs_info->tree_log_mutex --> &ei->delalloc_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ei->delalloc_mutex);
lock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
lock(&ei->delalloc_mutex);
lock(&type->s_umount_key#19);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by fio/2365:
#0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00ca13f>]
btrfs_file_aio_write+0xcf/0x350 [btrfs]
#1: (&ei->delalloc_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00a864b>]
btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata+0x7b/0x240 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 2365, comm: fio Not tainted 3.4.0-rc2-debug+ #2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81598195>] print_circular_bug+0xda/0xeb
[<ffffffff8108ce29>] check_prev_add+0x719/0x730
[<ffffffff8108deb8>] ? __lock_acquire+0x388/0x900
[<ffffffff8108cf1a>] check_prevs_add+0xda/0x140
[<ffffffff8108d359>] validate_chain.isra.33+0x3d9/0x510
[<ffffffff8108deb8>] __lock_acquire+0x388/0x900
[<ffffffff8108e955>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[<ffffffff8113d1d8>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle+0x38/0x60
[<ffffffff815aa2a7>] down_read+0x47/0x5c
[<ffffffff8113d1d8>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle+0x38/0x60
[<ffffffff8108e88d>] ? __lock_release+0xad/0xd0
[<ffffffff8113d1d8>] writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle+0x38/0x60
[<ffffffffa00a0b2a>] shrink_delalloc+0x13a/0x200 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a7672>] reserve_metadata_bytes.isra.70+0x1c2/0x430 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8108e801>] ? __lock_release+0x21/0xd0
[<ffffffffa00a86ff>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata+0x12f/0x240 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a890b>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x3b/0x60 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bceea>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x14a/0x410 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff810cffbf>] ? do_writepages+0x1f/0x40
[<ffffffff810c641c>] generic_file_direct_write+0xcc/0x190
[<ffffffffa0112391>] __btrfs_direct_write+0x40/0x146 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00c602f>] ? btrfs_update_time+0x5f/0x160 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00ca3af>] btrfs_file_aio_write+0x33f/0x350 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff815ac54b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x50
[<ffffffff815ac54b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x50
[<ffffffffa00ca070>] ? __btrfs_buffered_write+0x340/0x340 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8115b1a9>] aio_rw_vect_retry+0xb9/0x160
[<ffffffff8115b0f0>] ? aio_advance_iovec+0x90/0x90
[<ffffffff8115caee>] aio_run_iocb+0x5e/0x150
[<ffffffff8115d265>] io_submit_one+0x175/0x220
[<ffffffff8115d6d9>] do_io_submit+0x129/0x1c0
[<ffffffff8115d77b>] sys_io_submit+0xb/0x10
[<ffffffff815ad122>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
