On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:37:08AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > The whole thing is about our overcommit stuff, that is, > since we are not able to get _precise_ number of reservation right now, we > usually > reserve more than what we need. > For this, we've done overcommit dance (thanks for Josef's work!) but it's > still not > enough for our reservation when we still have some disk space. > > I'm ok with this revert, but since we don't use up all the reserved space in > most time, > I assume the following can be an alternative, thanks,
Unfortunatelly the situation looks not good for 3.3 btrfs users, I'm looking for something we know that somehow (ie like in 3.2) works and are able to submit to the stable tree very soon. I'll definitelly test your alternative and if Chris applies it during the -rc phase we'll have more time to verify it or you/Josef fix it in another way. thanks, david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
