With 3.4-rc4 under certain workloads, I see btrfs_block_rsv_check return -ENOSPC.
Since btrfs_block_rsv_check can only return -ENOSPC or 0, relocation.c:3816 checks for -EAGAIN, which is either redundant or should be -ENOSPC, which I initially suspected. Let me know which the behaviour should be and I'll get a patch tested and sent. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel J Blueman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html