On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Felix Blanke wrote: > On 5/8/12 3:13 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > >Hallo, Clemens, > > > >Du meintest am 08.05.12: > > > >>>>But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for > >>>>repairing an ext2/3/4 system. > > > >>Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as > >>doomed. > > > >Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the > >directory tree does the job. > > Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is > telling you: The problem you have right now would be the same damn > problem, no matter what fs you would you. Every fs will be unusable > if you lose one disk in a raid0 setup. That's all what we are trying > to tell you for the last 15 mails :)
I think he's got the point by now. Can we stop this thread now, please? It doesn't seem to be serving any further purpose. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- No names... I want to remain anomalous. ---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
