On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:33:34PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi Josef,
> 
> Am 11.05.2012 15:31, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> >That previous patch was against btrfs-next, this patch is against 3.4-rc6 if 
> >you
> >are on mainline.  Thanks,
> 
> I tried your patch against mainline, after a few minutes I hit this bug.
> 

Heh duh, sorry, try this one instead.  Thanks,

Josef

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 9b9b15f..54af1fa 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
        /* used to order data wrt metadata */
        struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree ordered_tree;
 
-       /* for keeping track of orphaned inodes */
-       struct list_head i_orphan;
-
        /* list of all the delalloc inodes in the FS.  There are times we need
         * to write all the delalloc pages to disk, and this list is used
         * to walk them all.
@@ -156,6 +153,7 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
        unsigned dummy_inode:1;
        unsigned in_defrag:1;
        unsigned delalloc_meta_reserved:1;
+       unsigned has_orphan_item:1;
 
        /*
         * always compress this one file
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 8fd7233..aad2600 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ struct btrfs_root {
        struct list_head root_list;
 
        spinlock_t orphan_lock;
-       struct list_head orphan_list;
+       atomic_t orphan_inodes;
        struct btrfs_block_rsv *orphan_block_rsv;
        int orphan_item_inserted;
        int orphan_cleanup_state;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index a7ffc88..ff3bf4b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1153,7 +1153,6 @@ static void __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u32 
sectorsize,
        root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL;
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->dirty_list);
-       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->orphan_list);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->root_list);
        spin_lock_init(&root->orphan_lock);
        spin_lock_init(&root->inode_lock);
@@ -1166,6 +1165,7 @@ static void __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u32 
sectorsize,
        atomic_set(&root->log_commit[0], 0);
        atomic_set(&root->log_commit[1], 0);
        atomic_set(&root->log_writers, 0);
+       atomic_set(&root->orphan_inodes, 0);
        root->log_batch = 0;
        root->log_transid = 0;
        root->last_log_commit = 0;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 61b16c6..5ba68d0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2072,12 +2072,12 @@ void btrfs_orphan_commit_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
*trans,
        struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
        int ret;
 
-       if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list) ||
+       if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes) ||
            root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE)
                return;
 
        spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
-       if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list)) {
+       if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes)) {
                spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
                return;
        }
@@ -2134,8 +2134,8 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 
struct inode *inode)
                block_rsv = NULL;
        }
 
-       if (list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
-               list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
+       if (!BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
+               BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 1;
 #if 0
                /*
                 * For proper ENOSPC handling, we should do orphan
@@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 
struct inode *inode)
                        insert = 1;
 #endif
                insert = 1;
+               atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
        }
 
        if (!BTRFS_I(inode)->orphan_meta_reserved) {
@@ -2195,9 +2196,13 @@ int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 
struct inode *inode)
        int release_rsv = 0;
        int ret = 0;
 
+       /*
+        * evict_inode gets called without holding the i_mutex so we need to
+        * take the orphan lock to make sure we are safe in messing with these.
+        */
        spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
-       if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
-               list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+       if (BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
+               BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 0;
                delete_item = 1;
        }
 
@@ -2215,6 +2220,9 @@ int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 
struct inode *inode)
        if (release_rsv)
                btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
 
+       if (trans && delete_item)
+               atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2352,9 +2360,8 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root)
                 * add this inode to the orphan list so btrfs_orphan_del does
                 * the proper thing when we hit it
                 */
-               spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
-               list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
-               spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
+               atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
+               BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 1;
 
                /* if we have links, this was a truncate, lets do that */
                if (inode->i_nlink) {
@@ -3671,7 +3678,7 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
        btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
 
        if (root->fs_info->log_root_recovering) {
-               BUG_ON(!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan));
+               BUG_ON(!BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item);
                goto no_delete;
        }
 
@@ -6914,6 +6921,7 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
        ei->dummy_inode = 0;
        ei->in_defrag = 0;
        ei->delalloc_meta_reserved = 0;
+       ei->has_orphan_item = 0;
        ei->force_compress = BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE;
 
        ei->delayed_node = NULL;
@@ -6927,7 +6935,6 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
        mutex_init(&ei->log_mutex);
        mutex_init(&ei->delalloc_mutex);
        btrfs_ordered_inode_tree_init(&ei->ordered_tree);
-       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_orphan);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->delalloc_inodes);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->ordered_operations);
        RB_CLEAR_NODE(&ei->rb_node);
@@ -6972,13 +6979,11 @@ void btrfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
                spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
        }
 
-       spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
-       if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
+       if (BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
                printk(KERN_INFO "BTRFS: inode %llu still on the orphan list\n",
                       (unsigned long long)btrfs_ino(inode));
-               list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+               atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
        }
-       spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
 
        while (1) {
                ordered = btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent(inode, (u64)-1);
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to