On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Alexander Block
<abloc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Alex Lyakas
> <alex.bolshoy.bt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I also noticed that sometimes transid gets bumped up, but there
>> is no actual change.
>>
>> So let's say you identify that a particular part of the tree is not
>> shared anymore, and, say, eventually you get to a particular leaf
>> within that part of the tree. How would you detect that, say, a
>> particular INODE_ITEM (or, more difficult, an INODE_REF) is missing
>> from that leaf WRT to previous tree?
>>
>> The property you described perhaps suggests another method to find
>> leafs, in which *something* has changed. (Although within a leaf, does
>> it make sense to decode all items and to look at their transid - those
>> that have them - to filter out even more?) And yes, perhaps, looking
>> at transid alone will bring more such potential leafs into
>> consideration.
>>
>> However, how does this property help to determine *what* actually has
>> changed between the two trees? Like, for example, being able to tell
>> over which range of keys there possibly was a change, and iterate
>> within that range?
> When doing incremental sends, we always have two trees at hand. One
> where we know that it is already on the receiving side (we did already
> send it) and the one that we want to send now. To find the changes, we
> simply compare those trees. If an items misses on one tree, we know
> it's either new or deleted (depending on the tree the item lies in).
>
> I would suggest you to not put too much work into send. As already
> said, the btrfs send/receive patches are close to be posted to the
> mailing list. It's currently reviewed and when I get a "looks good now",
> I'll post it.
>>
>> Alex.

Thanks for the update, Alex. Efficiently comparing the trees is the
crux of what we were looking into.

Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to