On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:30:34PM -0600, Alex Lyakas wrote: > Greetings everybody, > > I am running a fio test on btrfs compiled from > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git, > up to commit: > cb77fcd88569cd2b7b25ecd4086ea932a53be9b3 Btrfs: delay iput with async extents > including this commit. > > Below is a fio configuration file, and later fio textual output. > Here: > https://docs.google.com/folder/d/0B1AuaIB8xZtbNTRuSW1zVGozWFE/edit > are "expected" vs "received" mismatch reports. Strangely, when I read > the mismatched block from the file reported as corrupted by fio, I > receive data different both from "expected" and "received" blocks that > fio reports. I added one such file (job0.1.0.88576.now) to the > pastebin as well. > > If you think that my fio configuration file is faulty, please let me > know. fio version is 1.59. The idea is to run 10 io processes in > parallel. >
So we think it may be enospc, so try btrfs-next git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git which has an enospc fix related to creating a crapptone of files. Let me know if that helps. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
