On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:05:10AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > It is better that update i_size in endio, I think. because during endio, we > > are sure that > > the data is flushed into the disk successfully, and can update i_size at > > ease. and if the > > error happens when flushing the data into the disk, we also needn't reset > > i_size. > > I think the i_size update should happen sooner. The rest of the > filesystems work that way, and it will have fewer interaction problems > with the VM.
FYI: XFS only updates i_size in the end_io handler. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
