> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index ecaad40..9f2416c 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > @@ -1738,10 +1738,6 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root *root, > char *device_path) > > device->fs_devices = root->fs_info->fs_devices; > > - /* > - * we don't want write_supers to jump in here with our device > - * half setup > - */ > mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); > list_add_rcu(&device->dev_list, &root->fs_info->fs_devices->devices); > list_add(&device->dev_alloc_list,
Is the locking still required for approximately the same reason? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
