>>> Allocated_area: >>> Data,RAID0: Size:921.75MB, Used:256.00KB >>> /dev/vdc 307.25MB >>> /dev/vdb 307.25MB >>> /dev/vdd 307.25MB >>> >>> Data,Single: Size:8.00MB, Used:0.00 >>> /dev/vdb 8.00MB >>> >>> System,RAID1: Size:8.00MB, Used:4.00KB >>> /dev/vdd 8.00MB >>> /dev/vdc 8.00MB >>> >>> System,Single: Size:4.00MB, Used:0.00 >>> /dev/vdb 4.00MB >>> >>> Metadata,RAID1: Size:460.94MB, Used:24.00KB >>> /dev/vdb 460.94MB >>> /dev/vdd 460.94MB >>> >>> Metadata,Single: Size:8.00MB, Used:0.00 >>> /dev/vdb 8.00MB >>> >>> Unused: >>> /dev/vdb 2.23GB >>> /dev/vdc 2.69GB >>> /dev/vdd 2.24GB >> >> Couple minor things, in order of personal opinion of severity: >> >> * Devices should be listed in a consistent order; device names are >> just too consistently similar > Could you elaborate ? I didn't understood well
Thereby demonstrating the problem :) Data,RAID0: Size:921.75MB, Used:256.00KB /dev/vdc 307.25MB /dev/vdb 307.25MB /dev/vdd 307.25MB Unused: /dev/vdb 2.23GB /dev/vdc 2.69GB /dev/vdd 2.24GB The first goes c, b, d; the second goes b, c, d. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
