On 2012-10-28 11:38, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli: >> On 2012-10-28 00:38, Hugo Mills wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:30:44AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: >>>> Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012 schrieb Michael Kjörling: >>>>> On 27 Oct 2012 18:43 +0200, from mar...@lichtvoll.de (Martin >>>> >>>> Steigerwald): >>>>>> Possibly this could be done tabular as well, like: >>>>> Data: RAID 0 System: RAID 1 Unused >>>>> >>>>> /dev/vdb 307.25 MB - 2.23 GB >>>>> /dev/vdc 307.25 MB 8 MB 2.69 GB >>>>> /dev/vdd 307.25 MB 8 MB 2.24 GB >>>>> >>>>> ============ ============== ============ >>>>> >>>>> TOTAL 921.75 MB 16 MB 7.16 GB >>>> >>>> Hmmm, good idea. I like it this way around. >>>> >>>> It would scale better with the number of drives and there is a good >>>> way to place the totals. >>>> >>>> I wonder about how to possibly include the used part of each tree. >>>> With mostly 5 columns it might be doable. >>> >>> >>> Note that this could get arbitrarily wide in the presence of the >>> >>> (planned) per-object replication config. Otherwise, it works. The >>> width is probably likely to grow more slowly than the length, though, >>> so this way round is probably the better option. IMO. Eggshell blue >>> is good enough. :) >> >> I liked the Martin idea too. However I think that it is not applicable. >> Even on my simple test bed I got >> >> Data,Single: 8.00MB >> Data,RAID0: 307.25MB >> Metadata,Single: 8.00MB >> Metadata,RAID1: 460.94MB >> System,Single: 4.00MB >> System,RAID1: 8.00MB >> >> Plus we can have also Data+Metadata... > > One could still use multi row approach in that case: > > Data: RAID 0 System: RAID 1 Unused > /dev/vdb 307.25 MB - 2.23 GB > Data: RAID 1 System: RAID 0 > 250.12 MB 128 MB > Data: RAID 0 System: RAID 1 Unused > /dev/vdc 307.25 MB 8 MB 2.69 GB > Data: RAID 1 System: RAID 0 > 250.12 MB - > […] > > But still if if can be arbitrarily long due to that per object replication > config, a vertical output might and leaving graphical representation to a > Qt Quick application or so might be better.
Yes, this is my same feel: For console I prefer a text representation in rows, leaving to a graphical GUI to show the information in columns.. -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
