On 29 Oct 2012 23:21 +0100, from kreij...@gmail.com (Goffredo Baroncelli): > Hi all, > > this is a new attempt to improve the output of the command "btrfs fi df". > > The previous attempt received a good reception. However there was no a > general consensus about the wording.
In general, I like it. And I think that especially with today's large terminals (with frame buffers and X11), one doesn't need to be too fixated at an 80 column terminal width. One thing, though; what is the difference between "unused" and "unallocated"? If there is no difference, I feel the same word should be used throughout. -- Michael Kjörling • http://michael.kjorling.se • mich...@kjorling.se “People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don’t.” (Bjarne Stroustrup) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
