On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Bob Marley <bobmar...@shiftmail.org> wrote: > On 11/10/12 22:23, Hugo Mills wrote: >> >> The closest thing is btrfsck. That's about as picky as we've got to >> date. >> >> What exactly is your use-case for this requirement? > > > We need a decently-available system. We can rollback filesystem to > last-known-good if the "test" detects an inconsistency on current btrfs > filesystem, but we need a very good test for that (i.e. if last-known-good > is actually bad we get into serious troubles).
Scrub is probably more useful as a check, combined with "does the filesystem actually mount". > So do you think btrfsck can return a false "OK" result? can it "not-see" an > inconsistency? No set of checks will ever be perfect, so yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
