Thanks. I shall mark it as in progress then.
For writer's contention, I was thinking of decreasing the lock granularity. I have not really thought about it deeply yet, but my initial plans are to identify areas where we can distribute the locks, and maybe use techniques such as combining trees. Thanks a ton, Atri On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Josef Bacik <jba...@fusionio.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:24:23PM -0700, Atri Sharma wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I was looking through the project ideas page for picking up a project >> do start working with BTRFS. I am really interested in Btree lock >> contention project, but it seems to be marked that it has already been >> done in v3.1 >> >> Is the project still open? Can I work on it? >> > > Go for it, we still have plenty of lock contention, it's just in 3.1 we > switched > to a read/write lock which helped a bunch. Still if you have all writers you > are going to hit quite a bit of lock contention, especially on the root nodes. > If you have ideas go for it. Thanks, > > Josef -- Regards, Atri l'apprenant -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
