On Jan 8, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli <kreij...@tiscalinet.it> wrote:
> Hi Karel, > > On 01/08/2013 07:01 PM, Karel Zak wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 07:28:55PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >>> If the first superblock is valid except that the "magic field" is zeroed, >>> btrfs skips the check of the other superblocks. >>> If the first superblock is fully invalid, btrfs checks for the other >>> superblock. >> >> Hmm... why inconsistent (or missing) superblock is not reported as a >> problem? If I good understand the filesystem is still mountable, >> right? > > It should, however my tests were unsuccessful :-(... Chris ? I haven't tried mounting after wipefs, only after wipefs and subsequent mkfs.ext4; in that case the file system mounts without error as ext4. If I use mount -t btrfs I get an error. I haven't tried mounting with -t btrfs -o recovery. Chris Murphy-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
