On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:46:51PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:41:01PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > I tried to build 'btrfs' only and moved the static libs definition to > > > the beginning (still needs the uuid static library though): > > > > Which you haven't included - you sould also include btrfsck at bare > > minimum ;) > > > > > --- a/Makefile > > > +++ b/Makefile > > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ prefix ?= /usr/local > > > +STATIC_LIBS= -lpthread > > > +static: CFLAGS += -static > > > +static: LIBS = $(STATIC_LIBS) > > > > I think you mean += since this will not build since it misses libuuid > > > > If you don't have the libs to do a static build - that is one thing but > > it should work =) > > Resume: if the distro contains all required libs as static, then your > patch works.
Yeah... But if it's shipped in a dist i assume they will create static versions and srip them, just like it seems that other dists does. > I wanted to get an idea how the static build would go so my patch > was a dirty workaroud, that did not work in the end anyway. =) I was a bit confused about it - but you are right, 'btrfs' and 'btrfsck' is the only two we really need to have as static... > david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
