On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:21:30PM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Josef Bacik <jba...@fusionio.com> wrote: > > > > > Is there any chance you got the line above [ cut here ]? (I hate that > > stupid [ > > cut here ], it makes us miss all the usefull info.) Thanks, > > > > Josef > > There was really nothing significant above the 'cut here'. Here it is > with over an hour of earlier context: >
Sigh, I don't know why this warn_on(1, printk) isn't doing it's job. Here is a debug patch, please capture the output from this so I can figure out what is going on. Thanks, Josef diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 66f999b..eed5554 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -4715,9 +4715,10 @@ int map_private_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start, } if (start + min_len > eb->len) { - WARN(1, KERN_ERR "btrfs bad mapping eb start %llu len %lu, " + printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs bad mapping eb start %llu len %lu, " "wanted %lu %lu\n", (unsigned long long)eb->start, eb->len, start, min_len); + WARN_ON(1); return -EINVAL; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html