On 02/25/2013 11:54 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> The coverity had a false positive complaining that save_ptr
> is uninitialized in the call to strtok_r.
>
> We could initialize it, but Zach points out that just using
> strsep is a lot simpler if there's only one delimiter,
> so just switch to that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sand...@redhat.com>
> ---
> cmds-balance.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmds-balance.c b/cmds-balance.c
> index b671e1d..e8b9d90 100644
> --- a/cmds-balance.c
> +++ b/cmds-balance.c
> @@ -67,11 +67,9 @@ static int parse_one_profile(const char *profile, u64
> *flags)
> static int parse_profiles(char *profiles, u64 *flags)
> {
> char *this_char;
> - char *save_ptr;
>
> - for (this_char = strtok_r(profiles, "|", &save_ptr);
> - this_char != NULL;
> - this_char = strtok_r(NULL, "|", &save_ptr)) {
> + while ((this_char = strsep(&profiles, "|"))) {
> + printf("got profile %s\n", this_char);
In the original code the printf() doesn't exist. May be this is a
residual of a debugging code ?
> if (parse_one_profile(this_char, flags))
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -136,14 +134,12 @@ static int parse_filters(char *filters, struct
> btrfs_balance_args *args)
> {
> char *this_char;
> char *value;
> - char *save_ptr;
>
> if (!filters)
> return 0;
>
> - for (this_char = strtok_r(filters, ",", &save_ptr);
> - this_char != NULL;
> - this_char = strtok_r(NULL, ",", &save_ptr)) {
> + while ((this_char = strsep(&filters , ","))) {
> + printf("got %s\n", this_char);
Same here
> if ((value = strchr(this_char, '=')) != NULL)
> *value++ = 0;
> if (!strcmp(this_char, "profiles")) {
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
