On 03/10/2013 06:20 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 03:01:12PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> Hi Hugo,
>>
>> could you please add also to the btrfs man page a section where are
>> described the nCmSpP levels ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> GB
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/09/2013 09:31 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills <h...@carfax.org.uk>
>>> ---
> [snip]
>>> diff --git a/man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in b/man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in
>>> index 41163e0..2e71e65 100644
>>> --- a/man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in
>>> +++ b/man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in
>>> @@ -37,7 +37,29 @@ mkfs.btrfs uses all the available storage for the 
>>> filesystem.
>>>  .TP
>>>  \fB\-d\fR, \fB\-\-data \fItype\fR
>>>  Specify how the data must be spanned across the devices specified. Valid
>>> -values are raid0, raid1, raid10 or single.
> 
>    Like here?

Yes, I thought about a section which lists the allowable raid level.

> 
>>> +values are of the form <n>C[D][<m>S[<p>P]], where <n> is the number of 
>>> copies
>>> +of data, <m> is the number of stripes per copy, and <p> is the number of 
>>> parity
>>> +stripes. The <m> parameter must (currently) be a literal "m", indicating 
>>> that
>>> +as many stripes as possible will be used. The letter D may be added to the
>>> +number of copies, to indicate non-redundant copies (e.g. on the same 
>>> device).
>>> +
>>> +The following deprecated values may also be used:
>>> +.RS 16
>>> +.P
>>> +single     1C
>>> +.P
>>> +raid0      1CmS
>>> +.P
>>> +raid1      2C
>>> +.P
>>> +dup                2CD
>>> +.P
>>> +raid10     2CmS
>>> +.P
>>> +raid5      1CmS1P
>>> +.P
>>> +raid6      1CmS2P
>>> +.RS -16
>>>  .TP
>>>  \fB\-f\fR
>>>  Force overwrite when an existing filesystem is detected on the device.
> 


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to