On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Joeri Vanthienen <m...@joerivanthienen.be> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question about replacing a drive in raid10 (and linux kernel 3.8.4). > A bad disk was physical removed from the server. After this a new disk > was added with "btrfs device add /dev/sdg /btrfs" to the raid10 btrfs > FS. > After this the server was rebooted and I mounted the filesystem in > degraded mode. It seems that a previous started balance continued. > > At this point I want to remove the missing device from the pooI (btrfs > device delete missing /btrfs). Is this safe to do ?
Yep. > The disk usage numbers look weird to me, also the limited amount of > data written to the new disk after the balance. You're not actually looking at the data on the disk, but the size of the block groups allocated on that disk. I expect the data got spread across all of the remaining disks, including the new one. Probably worth running a scrub anyway though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
