Le 02/04/2013 19:04, Roman Mamedov a écrit : > but at this point I trust my data to BTRFS more, than I would trust ZFS.
My experience with ZFS on Linux is still somewhat limited, the only thing that I can say is that I've used it for about 2 years and a half on my (quite loaded) home server without ever encoutering a single issue (besides some tricky Ubuntu version upgrades, only due to the fact that ZFS is "not in the standard kernel" by opposition to BTRFS). On the BTRFS side, I've used it on 5 machine for about a year on a daily basis ; I've completely lost a filesystem, beyond repair, twice ; I found myself with a machine that wouldn't boot anymore and would necessitate serious and tricky FS maintenance, 3 times, I had to completely reinstall the FS because of extremely degraded performance, 4 times. Add to this that the FS management tools and properly working FS features are an order of magnitude better in ZFS than in BTRFS... That's enough for me... I've already converted 2 machines from BTRFS to ZFS since yesterday. My netbook (now ZFS) boots to GDM in less than 30 seconds. My son's same machine (except for the FS) takes 75 MORE seconds. You get it. Kind regards. -- Swâmi Petaramesh <sw...@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
