__merge_refs() always return 0, it is unnecessary
for the caller to check the return value.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <[email protected]>
---
Changelog v1->v2:
- don't make __add_missing_keys() return type to be void
  so that makes people aware of unhandled BUG_ON() from read_tree
  block().
- rename title to be more accurate
---
 fs/btrfs/backref.c |   11 +++--------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index dc200f6..13720d4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int __add_missing_keys(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
  *           having a parent).
  * mode = 2: merge identical parents
  */
-static int __merge_refs(struct list_head *head, int mode)
+static void __merge_refs(struct list_head *head, int mode)
 {
        struct list_head *pos1;
 
@@ -489,7 +489,6 @@ static int __merge_refs(struct list_head *head, int mode)
                }
 
        }
-       return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -884,18 +883,14 @@ again:
        if (ret)
                goto out;
 
-       ret = __merge_refs(&prefs, 1);
-       if (ret)
-               goto out;
+       __merge_refs(&prefs, 1);
 
        ret = __resolve_indirect_refs(fs_info, search_commit_root, time_seq,
                                      &prefs, extent_item_pos);
        if (ret)
                goto out;
 
-       ret = __merge_refs(&prefs, 2);
-       if (ret)
-               goto out;
+       __merge_refs(&prefs, 2);
 
        while (!list_empty(&prefs)) {
                ref = list_first_entry(&prefs, struct __prelim_ref, list);
-- 
1.7.7.6





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to