-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/05/13 16:13, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> i want to know if btrfs hot relocation support is still meanful

It is to me.  The problem with bcache is that it is a cache.  ie if you
have a 256GB SSD and a 500GB HDD then you'll have total storage of 500GB.
 Hot relocation was described as having 750GB available in the same scenario.

I'd also expect btrfs level support to be more friendly such as being able
to mount -o degraded if one of the devices is missing.

Roger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGLSIkACgkQmOOfHg372QSHQACeLwbhnVsH7+/6ZSIaGAcMUyBe
gPwAoNAKBAFB65XZQbLyxyCJPHODR+9z
=6OXt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to