On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:54:17AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Quoting Miao Xie (2013-05-16 03:22:37)
> > > I must say that the patch itself looks harmless, the reason is not good 
> > > enough.
> > 
> > I don't agree with you.
> > It is perishing that The memory reclaim task is blocked for a long time. We 
> > should avoid
> > this problem.
> 
> synchronize_rcu and friends can take a very very long time.  I like this
> patch as a way to avoid them, it's just keeps the whole kernel moving.
> 
> -chris

Okay, that teaches me another lesson, thanks Miao :)

thanks,
liubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to