On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:31:17PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > Hello David, > > > From: Zach Brown <z...@redhat.com> > > > duplicate information.
git-send-email tricked me, the line is not present in thre tree > > > From: Zach Brown <z...@redhat.com> > > > > We don't need callers to manage string storage for each pretty_sizes() > > call. We can use a macro to have per-thread and per-call static storage > > so that pretty_sizes() can be used as many times as needed in printf() > > arguments without requiring a bunch of supporting variables. > > > > This lets us have a natural interface at the cost of requiring __thread > > and TLS from gcc and a small amount of static storage. This seems > > better than the current code or doing something with illegible format > > specifier macros. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <z...@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.cz> > > OK. please add my tag: Acked-by: Wang Shilong <wangs.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > (I have given my tag in the previous thread to Zach and cc to you!) > > Zach gives a better solution,but i at least report and try for it. Isn't it? Oh sorry, I'll add the tag of course, I was so excited with zach's patch and missed it. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
