On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:45:45AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:31:05AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > As far as I can tell we'll be carrying this patch until a better > > solution is possible. > > > > When that will happen, I don't know. > > --Mark > > Well, what do I get when I pretend I don't care any more? The little voice > in my head says "keep plugging away". Here's another attempt at fixing this > problem in a sane manner. Basically, this time we're adding a flag to > s_flags which btrfs sets. Proc will see the flag and call ->getattr(). > > This compiles, but it needs testing (which I will get to soon). It still has > a bunch of problems in my honest opinion but maybe if we get something > acceptable upstream we can work from there. > > Also, as Andrew pointed out there's more than one place which is return > different device than from stat(2) so I probably need to update more sites > to deal with this.
Yes, we need to fix unix_diag, fanotify fdinfo, ... > > Does anyone see a problem with this approach? Looks good for me. Thanks. > --Mark > > -- > Mark Fasheh > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
