On 08/12/2013 02:13 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
This is a regression test for a problem we had where we'd assume we had created
a directory if it only had subvols inside of it. This was happening because
subvols would have lower inode numbers than our current send progress because
their inode numbers are based off of a different counter. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fusionio.com>
---
tests/btrfs/002 | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/002.out | 2 +
tests/btrfs/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/002
create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/002.out
Thanks for the patch Josef, this has been committed:
commit 6ef348f857ee2912b034ab0148bab7cdb814c0e7
Author: Josef Bacik <jba...@fusionio.com>
Date: Mon Aug 12 19:13:22 2013 +0000
xfstests: btrfs/008, another send regression test
This is a regression test for a problem we had where we'd assume we
had created
a directory if it only had subvols inside of it. This was
happening because
subvols would have lower inode numbers than our current send
progress because
their inode numbers are based off of a different counter. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sand...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohns...@sgi.com>
[rjohnston: renumbered test from 002 to 008]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
