On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:39 PM, David Sterba <dste...@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 11:39:28AM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT
>> +static int key_search_validate(struct extent_buffer *b,
>> + struct btrfs_key *key,
>> + int level)
>> +{
> ...
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static int key_search(struct extent_buffer *b, struct btrfs_key *key,
>> + int level, int *prev_cmp, int *slot)
>> +{
>> + if (*prev_cmp != 0) {
>> + *prev_cmp = bin_search(b, key, level, slot);
>> + return *prev_cmp;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ASSERT(key_search_validate(b, key, level));
>
> But what if I want to use key_search_validate out of the context of an
> ASSERT ?
Right. But right now nothing else uses it. Shall the need for it come,
it's trivial to address.
> I don't see a reason why the function needs to be under #ifdef
> BTRFS_ASSERT / #endif at all.
To avoid the compiler warning, as mentioned before.
Between patch versions v5 to v7, I don't have any strong preference.
All have correct, small and simple code.
>
>> + *slot = 0;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
--
Filipe David Manana,
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
