Holger Hoffstaette posted on Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:56:25 +0200 as excerpted: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:45:31 +0000, Duncan wrote: > >> 3.11.3. However, it /should/ be in the /next/ set 3.11-stable release, >> as they uncrossed their signals and GKH said he'd pull them this time. >> (You > > There are no btrfs updates in 3.11.4. I know because I just built -rc1 5 > minutes ago and again had to apply some emergency patches myself.
I had forgotten whether it was 3.11.3 or 3.11.4 that was current, but that crossed-signals thread is too fresh for the patches to be in whatever's current, thus the reason I said "next" instead of 3.11.4 or 3.11.5, since I didn't know and didn't want to go look which it would be. But since you mentioned 3.11.4 didn't have them, I'd (now) expect them to be in 3.11.5... -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
