On 11/20/13, 12:30 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > Quoting Fengguang Wu (2013-11-19 23:05:51) >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:56:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Which tree is 'devel-snb'? I don't see that on the kernel.org trees. >> >> It's my local merge branch, based on the latest upstream release. >> >> Let's CC the btrfs developers for this warning. :) >> >> Thanks, >> Fengguang >> >>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, kbuild test robot >>> <fengguang...@intel.com> wrote: >>>> tree: devel-snb-x86_64-201311200240 >>>> head: 1a985a0807ea34f37a4c5287089abd1cd2f65049 >>>> commit: a9b93a3684dd6ebfb7cfa173f78a79c09de81207 Merge >>>> 'kees/format-security' into devel-snb-x86_64-201311200240 >>>> date: 6 hours ago >>>> config: make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig >>>> >>>> All error/warnings: >>>> >>>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6201:12: sparse: symbol 'get_raid_name' was not >>>> declared. Should it be static? >>>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2469:28: sparse: context imbalance in >>>> 'run_clustered_refs' - unexpected unlock >>>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8304:9: sparse: context imbalance in >>>> 'btrfs_put_block_group_cache' - wrong count at exit >>>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function '__link_block_group': >>>>>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8430:9: error: format not a string literal and no >>>>>> format arguments [-Werror=format-security] >>>> get_raid_name(index)); > > This comes from the btrfs-next tree, with Jeff's sysfs patches, so I've > added Jeff.
Thanks for the heads up. I have a few other fixes that need to go into that patch set WRT cleanup too. -Jeff -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
