On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:16:15PM -0800, Nacho Man wrote: > > > On Monday, December 23, 2013 4:39 AM, Hugo Mills <h...@carfax.org.uk> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:27:17PM -0800, Nacho Man wrote: > > Hello, > > I ran dmesg and saw a bunch of these: > > [564421.874063] BTRFS debug (device sda2): unlinked 32 orphans > > [568021.386733] BTRFS debug (device sda2): unlinked 32 orphans > > [569943.269610] BTRFS debug (device sda2): unlinked 32 orphans > > [570929.840278] BTRFS debug (device sda2): unlinked 32 orphans > > [570942.035251] BTRFS debug (device sda2): unlinked 33 orphans > > [571623.719086] BTRFS debug (device sda2): unlinked 32 orphans > > [572075.684003] BTRFS debug (device sda2): unlinked 32 orphans > > > > I just counted and there's a 175 of them. Do I have to worry? I've been > > working on a toolchain and some other stuff for the PS3 so my hard drive > > was being accessed a bit. Could it be related? Thanks. > > No, this is harmless. Orphans are files that were deleted while > they were still held open by a process. POSIX semantics requires that > the file data is still readable by the process, but that the file's > hardlink(s) are no longer visible -- so there's no way of finding the > file again by "normal" methods. Once the process closes the file, it > is unlinked. > > > Thank you very much. Is there a way to suppress these messages about > orphaned files? I'd still like to see messages if something goes > wrong, just not so much the orphaned files...
The message level is 'debug', you can easily filter it out. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
