On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com> wrote:
> Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't
> reproduce. Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT
> set,
> which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in.
> This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist
> in
> his original patch. Fix this by changing how we make sure
> del_waiting_dir_move
> asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check.
> This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off. Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdman...@gmail.com>
Thanks Josef.
I actually had the ASSERT(del_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino) == 0), I
didn't had only the function declaration inside #ifdef
CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT ... #endif. Obviously because I never built with
assertions disabled and totally forgot about not using expressions
with side effects inside assert macros.
> ---
> fs/btrfs/send.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
> index f71fcbc..afb145d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
> @@ -2734,8 +2734,6 @@ static int add_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx,
> u64 ino)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT
> -
> static int del_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino)
> {
> struct rb_node *n = sctx->waiting_dir_moves.rb_node;
> @@ -2756,8 +2754,6 @@ static int del_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx,
> u64 ino)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> -#endif
> -
> static int add_pending_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 parent_ino)
> {
> struct rb_node **p = &sctx->pending_dir_moves.rb_node;
> @@ -2862,7 +2858,9 @@ static int apply_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct
> pending_dir_move *pm)
> }
>
> sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino + 1;
> - ASSERT(del_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino) == 0);
> + ret = del_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino);
> + ASSERT(ret == 0);
> +
> ret = get_cur_path(sctx, pm->ino, pm->gen, to_path);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Filipe David Manana,
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
