For what reason?

Remember that a single block device can be mounted in multiple places
> (or bind-mounted, etc), so there is not even necessarily a single
> answer to that question.

-Eric

 Yes indeed. (the attempt is should we be able to maintain all
 the mount points as a list saved/updated under per fs_devices. ?)

 some of the exported symbols at fs/namei.c looks closely
 related to the purpose here, but it didn't help unless
 I missed something.

 any comment is helpful..

 The reason:
    First of all btrfs-progs has used "scan-all-disks" very
    liberally which isn't a scalable design (imagine a data
    center with 1000's of LUN).
    Even a simple check_mounted() does scan-all-disks (when
    total_disk >1), that isn't necessary if the kernel could
    let it know.
    Scan for btrfs has expensive steps of reading each super-block,
    and the effect is, in general most of the btrfs-progs commands
    are very very slow when things like scrub is running.
    check_mounted() fails when seeding is used (since
    /proc/self/mounts would show disk with lowest devid and in
    most common scenario it will be a seed disk. (which has
    different FSID from the actual disk in question). and
    Further most severe problem is some btrfs-progs threads has been
    scan-all-disks more than once during the thread's life time.
    So a total revamp of this design has become an immediate need.

    What I am planning is
       - btrfs-progs to init btrfs-disk-list once per required thread
         (mostly use BTRFS_IOC_GET_DEVS, which would dump anything
         and everything about the btrfs devices)
       - the btrfs-disk-list is obtained from kernel first, and will
         fill with the remaining disks which kernel isn't aware of.
       - If the step one also provides the mount point(s) from the
         kernel that would complete the loop with what end user
         would want to know.


Thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to