On 25/03/14 03:29, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:11:43AM +0000, Martin wrote:
There's a big thread a short while ago about using parity across
n-devices where the parity is spread such that you can have 1, 2, and up
to 6 redundant devices. Well beyond just raid5 and raid6:
http://lwn.net/Articles/579034/
Aah, ok. I didn't understand you meant that. I know nothing about that, but
to be honest, raid6 feels like it's enough for me :)
There are a few of us who are very much looking forward to these
special/flexible RAID types - for example RAID15 (very good performance,
very high redundancy, less than 50% diskspace efficiency). The csp
notation will probably make it easier to develop the flexible raid types
and is very much required in order to better manage these more flexible
raid types.
A typical RAID15 with 12 disks would in csp notation is written as:
2c5s1p
And some would like to be able to use the exact same redundancy scheme
even with extra disks:
2c5s1p on 16 disks (note, the example is not 2c7s1p, though that would
also be a valid scheme with 16 disks being the minimum number of disks
required)
The last thread on this (I think) can be viewed here,
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg23137.html where Hugo also
explains and lists the notation for the existing schemes.
--
__________
Brendan Hide
http://swiftspirit.co.za/
http://www.webafrica.co.za/?AFF1E97
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
