On 06/07/2014 03:34 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 19:03 +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >> There is (was ?) a project to address that: richacl >> http://www.bestbits.at/richacl/. This is not a btrfs project, but a >> linux kernel project because from a filesystem POV the >> implementation requires to store some information in a extended >> attributes: the check is performed at the VFS level. > >>> Now one could create a RAID5 on them, but apparently sda1 and >>> sda2 are on the same disk... so I'd like a way to tell btrfs that >>> these are the "same" and not really that redundant. >> >> Hugo Mill worked on something related to that [1] >> >> [1] "Thoughts on RAID nomenclature" >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg33782.html > > > Thanks for the info... should I put those 3 ideas to the > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas page? Or is > that just meant to be edited by the developers? >
You can add new ideas to the wiki pages, supporting by link and other info were available. This is the real nature of the wiki pages. However I am still convinced richacl/nfs4 acl are not strictly related to a specific filesystem. BR > Cheers, Chris. > -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
