On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:45:41PM -0700, Josef Bacik wrote:
> This is a regression from my patch a26e8c9f75b0bfd8cccc9e8f110737b136eb5994, 
> we
> need to only unlock the block if we were the one who locked it.  Otherwise 
> this
> will trip BUG_ON()'s in locking.c  Thanks,
> 

Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>

-liubo

> cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 8bb4aa1..f00165d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,8 @@ static int verify_parent_transid(struct extent_io_tree 
> *io_tree,
>  out:
>       unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, eb->start, eb->start + eb->len - 1,
>                            &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> -     btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(eb);
> +     if (need_lock)
> +             btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(eb);
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.0.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to