On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > > On 07/17/2014 03:39 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > During its tree walk, btrfs_drop_snapshot() will skip any shared > > subtrees it encounters. This is incorrect when we have qgroups > > turned on as those subtrees need to have their contents > > accounted. In particular, the case we're concerned with is when > > removing our snapshot root leaves the subtree with only one root > > reference. > > > > In those cases we need to find the last remaining root and add > > each extent in the subtree to the corresponding qgroup exclusive > > counts. > > > > This patch implements the shared subtree walk and a new qgroup > > operation, BTRFS_QGROUP_OPER_SUB_SUBTREE. When an operation of > > this type is encountered during qgroup accounting, we search for > > any root references to that extent and in the case that we find > > only one reference left, we go ahead and do the math on it's > > exclusive counts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de> > > Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > > index 813537f..1aa4325 100644 > > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > > @@ -8078,6 +8331,14 @@ int btrfs_drop_snapshot(struct btrfs_root *root, > > } > > root_dropped = true; > > out_end_trans: > > + ret = btrfs_delayed_qgroup_accounting(trans, root->fs_info); > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC noticed that root is already free at this point. > I switched it to tree_root instead ;)
Oh nice catch, thanks for pointing it out. Time to go update my suse patches. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html