Coverity pointed this out; in the newly added
qgroup_subtree_accounting(), if btrfs_find_all_roots()
returns an error, we leak at least the parents pointer,
and possibly the roots pointer, depending on what failure
occurs.

If btrfs_find_all_roots() returns an error, we need to
free up all allocations before we return.  "roots" is
initialized to NULL, so it should be safe to free
it unconditionally (ulist_free() handles that case).

Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sand...@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index b497498..8abe455 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -1973,7 +1973,7 @@ static int qgroup_subtree_accounting(struct 
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                                   elem.seq, &roots);
        btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq(fs_info, &elem);
        if (ret < 0)
-               return ret;
+               goto out;
 
        if (roots->nnodes != 1)
                goto out;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to