My miss. Thank you all for pointing out that actually ext4 performed much worse in this test. I am wondering whether there is some benchmarking has been done in all sorts of different workloads with comparison to ext4. I know btrfs vs ext4 is not the apple to apple test, but it will encourage users switch to btrfs.
-----Original Message----- From: Miao Xie [mailto:mi...@cn.fujitsu.com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 8:18 PM To: Ming Lei; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fs_mark test on btrfs on 3.16.0-rc6+ #1 SMP On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:38:17 +0000, Ming Lei wrote: > > Hi, > > I ran the fs_mark test on a single empty hard drive. After the test, the df > -h results are: > > /dev/sdk1 917G 39G 832G 5% /ext4 > /dev/sdj1 932G 53G 850G 6% /btrfs > > The test result for btrfs shows it ran 15 hours. Note there is no file/dir > remove operation which I knew very slow compared with ext4. > > [root@sh679 ~]# date;/root/fs_mark -v -n 1000000 -s 4096 -k -S 1 -D > 1000 -N 1000 -d /btrfs/ -t 10;date Mon Aug 11 11:32:54 PDT 2014 > > # /root/fs_mark -v -n 1000000 -s 4096 -k -S 1 -D 1000 -N 1000 > -d /btrfs/ -t 10 > # Version 3.3, 10 thread(s) starting at Mon Aug 11 11:32:54 2014 > # Sync method: INBAND FSYNC: fsync() per file in write loop. > # Directories: Round Robin between directories across 1000 > subdirectories with 1000 files per subdirectory. > # File names: 40 bytes long, (16 initial bytes of time stamp with > 24 random bytes at end of name) > # Files info: size 4096 bytes, written with an IO size of 16384 > bytes per write > # App overhead is time in microseconds spent in the test not > doing file writing related system calls. > # All system call times are reported in microseconds > FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead CREAT > (Min/Avg/Max) WRITE (Min/Avg/Max) FSYNC (Min/Avg/Max) > SYNC (Min/Avg/Max) CLOSE (Min/Avg/Max) UNLINK (Min/Avg/Max) > 8 10000000 4096 184.0 155517800 33 > 372 93743 7 16 3094 16450 54015 5420340 0 > 0 0 1 4 7777 0 0 0 > Tue Aug 12 02:40:01 PDT 2014 > > For hours, the disk utilization was around 95% and cpu utilization for all 12 > cores was very low and only one core showed around 26%wa. > > > To compare with Ext4: > The test for ext4 on a same model of hard drive ran 2.5 hours. > > [root@sh679 ~]# date;/root/fs_mark -v -n 1000000 -s 4096 -k -S 1 -D > 1000 -N 1000 -d /ext4/ -t 10;date Fri Aug 8 17:13:56 PDT 2014 # > /root/fs_mark -v -n 1000000 -s 4096 -k -S 1 -D 1000 -N 1000 -d > /ext4/ -t 10 > # Version 3.3, 10 thread(s) starting at Fri Aug 8 17:13:56 2014 > # Sync method: INBAND FSYNC: fsync() per file in write loop. > # Directories: Round Robin between directories across 1000 > subdirectories with 1000 files per subdirectory. > # File names: 40 bytes long, (16 initial bytes of time stamp with > 24 random bytes at end of name) > # Files info: size 4096 bytes, written with an IO size of 16384 > bytes per write > # App overhead is time in microseconds spent in the test not > doing file writing related system calls. > # All system call times are reported in microseconds. > > FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead CREAT > (Min/Avg/Max) WRITE (Min/Avg/Max) FSYNC (Min/Avg/Max) > SYNC (Min/Avg/Max) CLOSE (Min/Avg/Max) UNLINK (Min/Avg/Max) > 9 10000000 4096 105.0 156950153 19 > 449 1741759 6 15 2069984 32368 94751 2044364 0 > 0 0 1 4 4149 0 0 0 > Sat Aug 9 19:41:14 PDT 2014 From > Fri Aug 8 17:13:56 PDT 2014 to > Sat Aug 9 19:41:14 PDT 2014 It is not 2.5 hours, it's 26.5 hours. Thanks Miao > > Is it a known issue with btrfs or do I need to adjust the default parameters > for btrfs (I remember use the default to make btrfs)? > > Mount command shows: > /dev/sdk1 on /ext4 type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered) > /dev/sdj1 on /btrfs type btrfs (rw,relatime,seclabel,nospace_cache) > > Thanks > Ming > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" > in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
